Ask any engineering leader about estimation, and you’ll likely get a knowing smirk. Someone asks, “How long will this take?” and suddenly, you’re walking a tightrope. Overestimate, and you risk looking inefficient. Underestimate, and you set yourself up for failure.

Agile estimation and planning are intended to bring structure to this uncertainty, but many teams struggle with unrealistic deadlines and shifting priorities.  In this article, we'll look at why estimation is important, what techniques work, and how different roles in a team affect the process.  More importantly, we'll look at how to use estimation to improve predictability rather than as a source of stress.

Why Agile Estimation and Planning Matters More Than You Think

Agile focuses on adaptability, delivering value in small, iterative cycles rather than committing to rigid, long-term plans. Agile teams use structured frameworks like Scrum to divide projects into sprints. Each sprint consists of gathering requirements, developing features, testing, reviewing progress, and then deploying deliverables in manageable increments. However, the success of the entire process is dependent on one basic principle: accurate estimation and planning.

Why Agile Estimation Is Critical

When teams commit to working in a sprint, they must ensure that the tasks they take on are clearly defined, have an executable scope, are designed with validation in mind to confirm success, and are small enough to be iterated while still contributing to the product's growth.

This is where estimation comes in. A user story, whether in Jira, Azure Boards, or another agile tool, should be divided into smaller, more manageable steps. These tasks are then estimated, usually through relative sizing methods. The goal is not to assign numbers randomly, but rather to assess complexity, effort, and impact.

Pitfalls of Poor Estimation

 Without a solid estimation method, teams fall into one of two traps:

• Underestimating work can result in missed deadlines, rushed quality, and technical debt.
• Overestimating work can reduce efficiency and delay important deliveries.

Agile teams improve predictability, reduce risk, and align more closely with business objectives by breaking down larger initiatives into well-defined, incremental tasks.  This planning discipline benefits developers as it provides clarity to leadership, so that timelines and resource allocations are based on realistic expectations rather than gut instinct.

Choosing the Right Agile Estimation Technique for Your Team

Agile teams use a variety of estimation techniques, each meant to deal with uncertainty while improving predictability. Here are some of the most popular methods in Scrum and Agile planning:

Story Points and the Fibonacci Sequence

Story points are a relative estimation method (more on that later on) used to assess the effort required to complete a task. Instead of measuring time directly, teams use a numerical sequence to estimate complexity and effort which is often based on Fibonacci numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, etc.).

Why Fibonacci? The gaps between numbers grow larger as complexity increases, discouraging false precision in estimates. A task that is estimated at 8 points is significantly more complex than a 3, so teams consider the uncertainty involved.

Moreover, story points encourage a team-wide consensus. If a junior developer estimates a task at 8 while a senior developer sees it as a 3, the team can discuss and align on a middle-ground estimate. This approach fosters shared understanding and realistic planning.

T-Shirt Sizing

T-shirt sizing replaces numbers with size categories—XS, S, M, L, XL—to provide a broader and more intuitive way of estimating work. This technique is particularly useful for teams that prefer quick, high-level assessments without getting bogged down in numerical precision. The principle remains the same: larger sizes indicate greater effort and complexity.

Planning Poker

Planning poker gamifies estimation by allowing team members to choose a numerical value (often using physical or digital cards) that represents their perceived effort for a task. After everyone has revealed their choices, the team discusses any differences before settling on a final estimate.

This method helps to bring out different points of view, ensuring that both experienced and junior team members contribute to the estimation process.  It also reduces bias by preventing dominant voices in the room from influencing initial opinions.

Affinity Estimation

Teams use affinity estimation to group similar user stories before assigning relative estimates.  Rather than estimating each story separately, this method enables teams to quickly categorize tasks based on their similarity to known work.  This technique is especially useful for large backlogs, allowing teams to estimate efficiently without excessive debate.

Which Estimation Method Should You Use?

There are no right or wrong answers. Some teams prefer Fibonacci-based story points because of their structured logic, whereas others prefer the simplicity of T-shirt sizing. Planning poker is useful for teams that value discussion, whereas affinity estimation is ideal for quickly completing large sets of tasks.

Finally, the best method is the one that is appropriate for your team's experience, the complexity of your work, and your organization's Agile maturity.

Understanding Relative vs. Absolute Estimation in Agile

Estimating in agile does not imply that you can predict the future with absolute certainty.  It provides a structured method for determining the effort required to complete a task.  Agile teams typically use two estimation methods: Relative Estimation and Absolute Estimation. Each approach has a different purpose, and knowing when to use them can improve planning efficiency and project execution.

Relative Estimation

Relative estimation compares tasks rather than assigning specific timeframes. Instead of specifying exact hours or days, teams compare a new task to previously completed work. This method frequently employs story points or t-shirt sizes to depict effort and complexity.

In practice, teams use a familiar task, one that they have previously estimated and completed, as a benchmark. If a previous UI/UX task was given three story points, and the current one is slightly more complex, it could be given five. This process allows teams to estimate quickly without becoming bogged down in precise calculations. The Fibonacci sequence is widely used in relative estimation to ensure meaningful distinctions between different levels of effort.

Absolute Estimation

Absolute estimation, on the other hand, assigns a specific number of hours or days to a task. This method is useful when stakeholders require precise timelines or when work must be tracked against a strict deadline. Teams rely on historical data, expert judgment, and workload analysis to arrive at a fixed estimate.

For example, if a client requests a feature to be delivered within four days, the team will evaluate its complexity, assess available resources, and determine if it is feasible within the given timeframe. Unlike relative estimation, absolute estimation requires more detailed analysis and is typically used for contractual obligations or predictable tasks.

When to Use Each Approach

Relative estimation is ideal for agile teams working in iterative cycles, where flexibility and quick decision-making are priorities. It allows for adjustments as work progresses. Absolute estimation, however, is necessary when dealing with fixed deadlines, contractual commitments, or when precise effort tracking is required.

In many cases, teams use a hybrid approach, relying on relative estimation for sprint planning and absolute estimation for high-level roadmaps. Understanding the strengths of each method ensures better project planning and execution.

Roles in Agile Estimation and Planning: Who Does What?

Agile planning and estimation are a team effort, not only about giving tasks numbers. Every team member is vital in making sure estimates are reasonable, practical, and consistent with objectives. Under an Agile framework, the Scrum Team, Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Stakeholders each help in different ways contribute to the success of the planning process. Let's dissect every role and how Agile planning benefits from each.

The Development Team Provides Realistic Estimates

Agile estimation revolves mostly on the development team, which consists of testers, developers, and other technical experts. They assign story points depending on the degree of effort and feasibility and assess the complexity of the chores. Their technical knowledge guarantees that the estimations have reality based foundation. Their ability to divide more extensive user stories into smaller, more doable chores also greatly helps to increase estimate accuracy.

Still, estimate is not a one-sided process. Agile excels on teamwork, thus the development team has to participate actively in conversations during planning meetings. Through this teamwork, they can challenge presumptions, define criteria, and arrive to a common knowledge of what has to be done.  The development team pledges to produce the intended work within the sprint once the estimates are set and the sprint backlog is defined. Their participation is absolutely vital; without an involved team, estimation can turn from a data-driven, targeted exercise into a guessing game.

The Product Owner Brings Business Context

The Product Owner (PO) is the key link between the development team and the business. Their role is to make sure the work being estimated is consistent with the company's objectives and customer requirements. The PO clarifies the team's requirements so that they understand not only what needs to be built but also why it is important. This business context helps the development team to make informed decisions about the tasks ahead. 

Additionally, the Product Owner is in charge of managing scope changes, which are very common in Agile projects. While a project's scope may change, the PO keeps the team focused so that value is delivered even when changes occur. They also prioritize the backlog so the high-impact tasks are properly estimated and scheduled for the sprint. The PO is a constant source of business knowledge, answering questions about customer requirements, business objectives, and expected outcomes. Strong product owners verify the estimation process takes into account not only the technical viability of activities but also their wider corporate influence, matching the development effort with strategic objectives.

The Scrum Master Facilitates the Process

The Scrum Master facilitates the entire estimation and planning process. More than just a meeting scheduler, the scrum master handles the process so that it runs smoothly and that the team is adhering to agile best practices. One of their primary responsibilities is to facilitate discussions, so that every team member has a voice in the planning sessions. The scrum master works to create an environment where estimates are not made in isolation, but are instead the result of a consensus-driven process.

The scrum master also provides insights into past performance, such as velocity, which helps the team set realistic goals for the upcoming sprint. By understanding the team’s previous capacity, the team is not overburdened with unrealistic expectations. Additionally, the scrum master works to remove distractions during planning sessions, shielding the team from external interruptions so they can focus. The scrum master’s guidance is crucial for fostering a productive and engaged team that can estimate work accurately and deliver high-quality results.

Stakeholders Provide Feedback and Business Perspective

Stakeholders, such as executives, customers, or internal business leaders, are also a big part of the estimation and planning process. While they are not directly involved in the development work, their input helps shape the direction of the project. Stakeholders provide valuable feedback on which features are most critical from a business perspective, helping the Product Owner prioritize the backlog. Their insights help the development team to stay focused on building features that will deliver the most value to the business and its customers.

Throughout the project, stakeholders continue to review progress and provide feedback, so that the development team remains aligned with business needs. Stakeholders also play a role in setting expectations, aligning with the team on project timelines, deliverables, and desired outcomes. Their involvement helps to prevent misalignment between the development team’s efforts and the overall business strategy.

Key Differences of Product Owner and Project Manager

A common misconception in Agile is the overlap between a Product Owner (PO) and a Project Manager (PM). While they may collaborate, their responsibilities are distinct.

The PO controls wether the right product is being built, while the PM is worried about project delivery time and staying within budget. Understanding this distinction helps prevent role confusion and makes agile planning more effective and structured.

Solwey’s Approach to Agile Estimation and Planning

At Solwey, we understand that effective estimation and planning are fundamental to the success of any agile project. Our methodology is designed to bridge the gap between uncertainty and predictability, so that our teams deliver high-quality solutions on time, within scope, and aligned with our clients’ strategic goals.

Solwey recognizes that no one individual can provide a perfect estimate. Instead, we leverage the collective expertise of our cross-functional teams, including developers, designers, and business stakeholders. By adopting a consensus-driven approach, we guarantee that our estimates are grounded in reality, supported by diverse perspectives, and shaped by past performance data.

Furthermore, we believe in the power of continuous improvement, that’s why we conduct retrospectives to evaluate our estimation and planning processes. This allows us to identify areas for improvement and refine our techniques, making sure that we are always evolving to meet the demands of both our clients and the ever-changing landscape of software development.

Solwey’s goal is to make agile estimation and planning stress-free and deliver predictable, high-quality results that boost business success.

Want to learn more? Contact us and let’s get started!

‍